I haven't seen any reason to dislike Zoe Quinn, or Anita Sarkeesian. They seem to be doing a lot of good work, and I applaud them for that.

I find it disgusting and a thinly veiled attempt at an excuse to just attack people, the vast majority being women. The only "ethics" in video game journalism that gamergate supporters seem to care about is the kind where you violently punish the journalists (and developers, apparently, because why the fuck not?) who say anything you don't like.

>>1802
Agreed. Yet they have no issue with things like Nintendo Power, where Nintendo was basically reviewing their own games. People of other genders, sexualities, and sexualities not agreeing with you on what is and isn't offensive isn't a lack of ethics. It's the exact opposite.

Gamergate is a lynch mob. It began as lynch mob, it has consistently behaved as a lynch mob, and will forever be remembered as a lynch mob--and by forever I mean for about two more years before even the sweatiest gamer has forgotten.
I think it's ironic that Gamergate claims to be about "ethics in gaming journalism" even as it displays terrible ethics in gaming journalism. It's bad if a developer lays down copyright claims on a negative youtube review, but if Gamergate goes around violently harassing anyone that disagrees with it, it's fighting the good fight. Fuck that shit.

Both sides are dumb.

Just shut up and play video games.

its shit that none cares about you know?
who gives a fuck? people should stop freaking out over video games imo.

>>1807

agreed