>>132 I agree with you. Telling you the truth, it’s a pretty interesting subject to be put inside the game, in a fanfiction. But the conceptions you told in any moment disagree with what I have explained. Especially because the mechanisms of rape in a war zone are different from the, let’s say, generic explanation of rape in societies that aren’t currently in war conflicts that was where I have more or less placed my explanations, to clarify to the person that violent behaviors in general not always nurture from traumatic events that the aggressor may have suffered, a thing that... i don’t exactly know why, but practically turned into a commom place. And the Pleasure Principle – an freundian term – can easily absorb the concept of rape for power. In fact, I don’t doubt there are types of sociopaths that seek the pleasure of submit someone, to get power over this person, and they do it via rape. And leaders that created the mechanisms of rape as weapon – sadly, largely spotted in war zones – are easily classified by experts as sociopaths. Let’s not forget, too, that rape was a mechanism of the Evolution to perpetuate species, including ours. Unfortunately, we haven’t yet lost this genetic inclination of our genoma, which is a nuisance now, in terms of evolution. It’s completely useless now, in our society. In TF2, I’m pretty sure we can apply the two conceptions. It’s just a matter of imagination, inspiration, knowledge and… not to be totally stuck to what supposedly is canon or not. But I guess it was kinda my fault, too. I wasn’t too clear, perhaps, explaining about the technical aspects of what I have told. Sorry, I’m not that good in explaining things. Telling the truth, I’m now pretty sure of this thanks to this thread, hehe. >>132 That awesome moment when you are discussing things politely and reasonably and the only thing people that are unable to retort correctly can do is “aaaw I hate you sooo much shut up aaaah dieâ€. http://tinyurl.com/6txbcfn But at least you say something that make sense every now and then (like, that I have a twat, hehe). The next step is to learn how to do it without sound like an over dramatic offense-launcher machine. Come on, it’s not that hard to evolve. >>131 Calm down. In any point of the comment I just made, i am excusing the author. I just made some corrections in the pseudoscientific comments there are lurking around here. That's it. "And, too, HAVE IN MIND that with this post I JUST WANTED, basically, to clarify you guys." See? Even though the characterizations could have been made as if they were sociopaths - and i think it would be nice, since is somewhat a headcanon of mine – it wasn't what i was discussing in the comment, especifically. P.S: I didn’t say I’m an authority, just that I have a good notion and that I can help, if someone wants. There’s a huge difference. Btw, I’m assisted by an academic with 5 years of intense studies and a graduated professional with an approach of cognitive-behavioral. Are you sure you don’t want help? Hehe, it’s practically a free consulting. Srsly, jokes aside…did you at least reached the middle of the comment? I thought I made myself pretty clear. Not sure if my English is that bad, too, or that I write in a strange way, I don’t know…