>>9 D'oh! Usually I'm really good about deleting my edits, but at least that's the only one I take it. Sorry to bump without an update, but I do have a question for you guys. I've run into a problem while writing the last part. Do you guys feel you're capable of recognizing that when I refer to Engineer, I'm referring to that in a visual sense and really talking about Soldier, and vice-versa as long as they still talk as they normally do? This is the first time I've tried writing something like this and I've never read something like this either. Any suggestions would be most appreciated!